----- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Fri, 6 Dec 91 11:07:45 EST Here's an obvious correction, even though I'm reading fuzzy Kahn p865: Blatent hando in line 15201, word 6: should be R not D. Suggested revision: 15201B 4CPC89/ZC89/4OPOE/O8AE/SAE/8AR/4OBZC89/4OPC89/4OPC89/4OFC89/8AE- ----- From: Jim Gillogly Changes - old on top, new on bottom. Keypunch error (8 and , are on same key). _ 00507A OPSOE/4O,AM/SOJ/ZOJ/8AJO- 00507A OPSOE/4O8AM/SOJ/ZOJ/8AJO- Typo. _ 07704B OR/AM/SCFO89/8A_-4OFOE/OFAM/OFAR/OF9/OFOE89/OE- 07704B OR/AM/SCFO89/8AR-4OFOE/OFAM/OFAR/OF9/OFOE89/OE- Two typos from Reeds (152 is Kahn p. 865) _ 15226B 4OAR/ZC89/4OFAM/ZX9/4OPC89/RSR/OEPC89/ES9- 15226B 4OAR/ZC89/4OFAM/ZQ9/4OPC89/RSR/OEPC89/ES9- _ 15237B PSCC9/4OFCC9/4OFAE/ESC89/SCOEVAM/OFOE- 15237B PSCC9/4OFCC9/4OFAE/ESC89/SCOEFAM/OFOE- ----- From: Jim Gillogly Date: Tue, 10 Dec 91 06:37:42 PST Looks like general appropbation for using <> on line numbers and '.' and ',' instead of '/' for white space. I've modified the current working version, called "voynich.now" in the ftp directory to take these into account. The text now looks like this: <00101A> VAS92.9FAE.AR.APAM.ZOE.ZOR9.QOR92.9.FOR.ZOE89- <00102A> 2OR9.XAR.O.R.9.FAN.ZPAM.ZAR.AR*.QAR.QAR.8AD- <00103A> 29AU.ZCF9.OR.9FAM.ZO8.QOAR9.Q*R.8ARAM.29- <00104A> $OM.OPCC9.OPCOR.2OEOP9.Q*AR.8AM.OFAM.OE.OFAD- <00105A> 2AT.9.SCAR.QAM.WAR.YAM# <00106A> 98ARAIZO# ----- 13 Dec 91 Gillogly Added Reeds' preliminary transcriptions of f3v and f68r into the current working version. Will fix them later. Combined Reeds and Gillogly transcription of f55v. ----- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Fri, 13 Dec 91 16:42:22 EST <100v> {reeds, 13 dec 91, from Brumbaugh p86: ``medicinal herbs''} {USES EXTRA LETTERS: u for a CC ligature, o for an omega-like CCC lig.} {a very poor copy, possibly several letters lost all down left margin} ----- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sat, 14 Dec 91 12:39:42 EST voynich.now has<15234B> 8SCOE.FSCOE.FSC89.2OXC9.4OFAE.4OFAE.ZC89.ZOE89.4OPAE.8AR- which should be <15234B> 8SCOE.FSC89.2OXC9.4OFAE.4OFAE.ZC89.ZOE89.4OPAE.8AR- ----- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sat, 14 Dec 91 16:35:22 EST <100r> {reeds 14 dec 91, from Brumbaugh p86} ----- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sat, 28 Dec 91 17:43:46 EST {Jim Reeds, from Xerox negs supplied by Gillogly from BM microfilm} {20 dec 91} {20 dec 91} {20 dec 91} {21 dec 91} ------ From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 92 08:31:12 EST <6v> {f6v reeds 12 jan 92, from gillogly print from BM film} ------ From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Wed, 22 Jan 92 21:06:28 EST {reeds from Zimansky, 20/21 Jan 1992} [Merged with D'Imperio by Gillogly, 22 Jan 92] ------ Subject: voynich.new From: Jim Gillogly Date: Sun, 26 Jan 92 16:07:25 PST I modified voynich.now to include standard "f1r"-type line numbers. ------- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sun, 26 Jan 92 20:34:02 EST Voynich.New: good. May I suggest: (< = good, > = bad) 7c7 < [O82*]OM.OPCC9.OPCOR.2OEOP9.Q*AR.8AM.OFAM.OE.OFAD-{first char a plumed O?} --- > $OM.OPCC9.OPCOR.2OEOP9.Q*AR.8AM.OFAM.OE.OFAD- REASON: Petersen has a plumed O. Print looks clear, too. 1652c1652 < PS89.43FAR.SC89.4OFS89.4OFAM.OR.AR.AE.OE.FCO8AM.OE2- --- > PS89.43FAR.SC89.4_FS89.4OFAM.OR.AR.AE.OE.FCO8AM.OE2- REASON: petersen is clear here. 1911c1911 < 4O.9PSC9.ZXCW9 .. {stem} 9FSC89.SC89.ZX89# --- > 4O.9PSC9.ZXCW9 .. {stem} (9FSC89.SC89.ZX89# REASON: debris from editing away (CURRIER) experiment 2800d2799 < note frogguy at f100r.1 2817c2816 < BSCOE.ZCO8.4OBCCXG.cqt,pOPO.S*CO2.ZCCG.SQZO.2 {frogguy for split} --- > BSCOE.ZCO8.4OBCCXG.x8A,yOPO.S*CO2.ZCCG.SQZO.2 {x...y is an odd straddler: a P shape, with foot at x wearing an S shoe, and barefooted at y} REASON: Thats how I'm coding spits now. -------- Subject: Merged f1v From: Jim Gillogly Date: Sun, 26 Jan 92 19:27:35 PST Merged f1v from D'Imperio and Reeds with reference to BL print and Petersen. ----------- From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Mon, 27 Jan 92 15:20:09 EST To: jim@rand.org {reeds 27 jan 1992 from yale print via brumbaugh newsletter} ------------ Sujbect: Merged f2v, f3r, f3v, f4r D'Imperio/Reeds transcriptions From: Jim Gillogly Date: Fri Jan 31 13:03:48 PST 1992 {D'Imperio A merged with Reeds 20 Dec 91 by Gillogly, 30 Jan 92} {D'Imperio A merged with Reeds 20 Dec 91 by Gillogly, 30 Jan 92} {D'Imperio A merged with Reeds 13 Dec 91 by Gillogly, 30 Jan 92} {D'Imperio A merged with Reeds 21 Dec 91 by Gillogly, 31 Jan 92} From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 11:59:42 EDT To: jim@rand.org Subject: Voynich correctos for voynich.now the page marked f100v in voynich.now is really f101v1, and is apparently the right hand half of a 'logical page', the other half of which is f101v2, separated from it by a ridge crease. From: reeds@gauss.att.com Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 22:40:27 EDT To: jim@rand.org Subject: Voynich mistakes in voynich.now f5r in voynich.now is mislabelled f4r. ----------------------------------------------- To: reeds@research.att.com Cc: James_Gillogly@rand.org, j.guy@trl.oz.au, Mike Roe Subject: Voynich transcription status Date: Tue, 07 Sep 93 22:44:05 +0100 From: Mike Roe Message-Id: <"swan.cl.cam.:071110:930907214416"@cl.cam.ac.uk> If you're interested, I've just finished converting my transcriptions of f66r, f67r1, f67v2, f68v3 and f100v from Bennett notation into Currier. (I've written a program to do the conversion, but I have to go through and and manually check the converted transcription against the microfilm to catch the cases where there aren't exact equivalents in the two notations). Mike --------------------------------------------- JJG: added to voynich.now, 7 Sep 93 --------------------------------------------- From: reeds@research.att.com Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 12:43 EDT To: James_Gillogly@rand.org Subject: Voynich f111-f114 again. Jim, here is a slightly better cleanup. BEGIN { ff. 111v - 114r, First Study Group, transliterated into Currier by J. Reeds 10-13 Sept 93. From 20 keypunch coding sheets in Friedman Collection, Marshall Library, Lexington, VA, item 1613. (I fixed up the line numbers as well as I could, but did not proofread the actual Voynich transliteraion.) } --------------------- The following added 14 Sep 93, from Mike Roe --------- 119 09/14 Mike Roe Voynich folio 93r<< {D'Imperio A} { Roe, 8 120 09/14 Mike Roe Voynich folio 71v<< { Roe, 8th September 1 121 09/14 Mike Roe Voynich folio 70v2<< { Roe, 8th September 122 09/14 Mike Roe Voynich folio 68r1<< {Roe, 10th September 123+ 09/14 Mike Roe Voynich folio 86v3<< {D'Imperio B} { Roe, -----------------------------------------------------------------------